S.I. of police, perungudi p.s., vs Pal Ruby, jeyaseeln — 82/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 353,294(b), 506(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNMD140002342021
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
234/2021
Filing Date
24-06-2021
Registration No
82/2021
Registration Date
24-06-2021
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam
FIR Details
FIR Number
279
Police Station
PERUNGUDI
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.I. of police, perungudi p.s.,
Adv. The APP
Respondent(s)
Pal Ruby, jeyaseeln
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 19-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No. CC.82/2021 The court examined the cross-examination of witness PW-1 (Veeran) regarding allegations of water theft and panchayat-related disputes. The witness admitted to filing a complaint against the defendants following a panchayat meeting and acknowledged that the complaint may have been motivated by political rivalry in a prior panchayat election where the first defendant contested against him. The court found credibility issues and rejected the witness's testimony as potentially false. The case is dismissed/no further action ordered based on insufficient evidence and compromised witness credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No. CC.82/2021 The court examined the cross-examination of witness PW-1 (Veeran) regarding allegations of water theft and panchayat-related disputes. The witness admitted to filing a complaint against the defendants following a panchayat meeting and acknowledged that the complaint may have been motivated by political rivalry in a prior panchayat election where the first defendant contested against him. The court found credibility issues and rejected the witness's testimony as potentially false. The case is dismissed/no further action ordered based on insufficient evidence and compromised witness credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts