S.I.Of Police, Austinpatti P.S. vs Paraman and 5 others Advocate - Tr. T. Thandapani — 21/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379IPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNMD140000392015
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1279/2015
Filing Date
21-01-2015
Registration No
21/2015
Registration Date
21-01-2015
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam
FIR Details
FIR Number
384
Police Station
AUSTINPATTI
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.I.Of Police, Austinpatti P.S.
Adv. The App
Respondent(s)
Paraman and 5 others Advocate - Tr. T. Thandapani
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 17-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document contains witness depositions (statements) in Case No. CC 21/2015 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirumangalam, recorded on 17.02.2026. The depositions of two prosecution witnesses—Ragavan and Muthukumaranan—describe the recovery of a stolen vehicle in 2013, detailing how they located the vehicle, involved police, and provided testimony regarding the seizure and identification of the stolen vehicle. The document does not record a final court order granting or denying bail, allowing or dismissing a petition, or adjourning the case; it merely documents the witnesses' examination-in-chief statements during the trial proceedings. SKIP — This is a witness deposition record, not a court order with a dispositive outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document contains witness depositions (statements) in Case No. CC 21/2015 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirumangalam, recorded on 17.02.2026. The depositions of two prosecution witnesses—Ragavan and Muthukumaranan—describe the recovery of a stolen vehicle in 2013, detailing how they located the vehicle, involved police, and provided testimony regarding the seizure and identification of the stolen vehicle. The document does not record a final court order granting or denying bail, allowing or dismissing a petition, or adjourning the case; it merely documents the witnesses' examination-in-chief statements during the trial proceedings. SKIP — This is a witness deposition record, not a court order with a dispositive outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts