Mathuradha vs Mookammal Advocate - M.Dhanapandian — 1000304/2018
Case under Coalbearingareas(acquisitionanddevelopment)amendmentandvalidationact Section 27)(C). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD130004172018
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
416/2018
Filing Date
24-12-2018
Registration No
1000304/2018
Registration Date
24-12-2018
Court
District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam
Judge
2-Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mathuradha
Adv. R.G.Sankarganesh
Respondent(s)
Mookammal Advocate - M.Dhanapandian
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 01-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 1000304/2018 This is a witness deposition proceeding in O.S.No.304/2018 before the Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam, recorded on 12.06.2026. Witness Jeyaraj testified regarding a property dispute involving land ownership and inheritance rights. During cross-examination, the witness denied knowledge of key details about the property, the plaintiff Mathuradha's relationship to him, and the documentary evidence filed. The court recorded the witness's testimony and his acknowledgment that the deposition transcript was accurate, after which the judge signed the document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1000304/2018 This is a witness deposition proceeding in O.S.No.304/2018 before the Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam, recorded on 12.06.2026. Witness Jeyaraj testified regarding a property dispute involving land ownership and inheritance rights. During cross-examination, the witness denied knowledge of key details about the property, the plaintiff Mathuradha's relationship to him, and the documentary evidence filed. The court recorded the witness's testimony and his acknowledgment that the deposition transcript was accurate, after which the judge signed the document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts