G.Rajeshwari vs P.Velraj — 280/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(c). Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed without cost on 02nd April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD130003252024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
401/2024
Filing Date
20-11-2024
Registration No
280/2024
Registration Date
20-11-2024
Court
District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam
Judge
2-Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Decreed without cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
G.Rajeshwari
Adv. RENGANATHAN.K
Respondent(s)
P.Velraj
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 26-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 23-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-12-2025 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted the plaintiff Rajeswari's suit for permanent injunction against defendant Velraj. The court determined that the plaintiff has legal possession and ownership of the agricultural property transferred to her by her mother through a deed of settlement dated 18.06.2018, as evidenced by documentary proof (sale deed from 1994, transfer deed, property tax receipts, and electricity bills) and witness testimony. Accordingly, the court issued a perpetual injunction restraining the defendant and his associates from causing any interference or disturbance to the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court granted the plaintiff Rajeswari's suit for permanent injunction against defendant Velraj. The court determined that the plaintiff has legal possession and ownership of the agricultural property transferred to her by her mother through a deed of settlement dated 18.06.2018, as evidenced by documentary proof (sale deed from 1994, transfer deed, property tax receipts, and electricity bills) and witness testimony. Accordingly, the court issued a perpetual injunction restraining the defendant and his associates from causing any interference or disturbance to the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts