Dhanikodi and two others vs Kannuchamy and four others Advocate - DHANAPANDIAN M — 100281/2014
Case under Coalbearingareas(acquisitionanddevelopment)amendmentandvalidationact Section Order7Rule1. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNMD130003082014
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
281/2014
Filing Date
08-10-2014
Registration No
100281/2014
Registration Date
08-10-2014
Court
District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam
Judge
1-Principal District Munsif,Thirumangalam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dhanikodi and two others
Adv. PONNAMBALAM M
Ramasamy
Perumalsamy
Respondent(s)
Kannuchamy and four others Advocate - DHANAPANDIAN M
Subashchandran
Rathinasamy
Vijayan
Rajammal
Smt. Maheswari
K. Murugan
K. Venkatesan
K. Gobalakrishnan
Vijaya
S. Babu @ Chandrasekar
Mohan
Muthupandiammal
Amsavalli
Amsarajan
Meena
Sathya
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Munsif,Thirumangalam
IA Pending
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 15-04-2026 | Steps | |
| 02-04-2026 | Steps | |
| 18-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 09-03-2026 | Steps |
Interim Orders
This is a witness deposition record from O.S. No. 281/2014 in the Principal District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam, recorded on 12.08.2025. The witness Ramasamy (son of Palsammy) was examined and cross-examined regarding land ownership and inheritance matters related to property records and revenue settlement documents. The deposition was completed at 4:15 PM with no further cross-examination, and the witness affirmed the recorded testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a witness deposition record from O.S. No. 281/2014 in the Principal District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam, recorded on 12.08.2025. The witness Ramasamy (son of Palsammy) was examined and cross-examined regarding land ownership and inheritance matters related to property records and revenue settlement documents. The deposition was completed at 4:15 PM with no further cross-examination, and the witness affirmed the recorded testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts