Paulchamy and 6 others vs Rajammal and 5 others Advocate - P.G. Alagarsamy — 100257/2010
Case under Coalbearingareas(acquisitionanddevelopment)amendmentandvalidationact Section Order7Rule1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD130002802010
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
Filing Date
31-05-2010
Registration No
100257/2010
Registration Date
31-05-2010
Court
District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam
Judge
1-Principal District Munsif,Thirumangalam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Paulchamy and 6 others
Adv. M.Ponnambalam
Koodammal
Adv. ALAGARSAMY P G
Seeniammal (died)
Minnalkodi
Anushya
Jothibasu
Mohankumar
Ramaiah (died)
Muruganandam
Kavitha
Saroja
Vinodhini
Vinoth
Vijayalakshmi
Respondent(s)
Rajammal and 5 others Advocate - P.G. Alagarsamy
Raju (died)
Pandi
Jeyachandrapandian
Jeyasudha
Amernathsanth
Sekar (died)
Uma maheswari
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Munsif,Thirumangalam
Evidence
Orders
IA Pending
IA Pending
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-04-2026 | Orders |
| 18-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 16-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The Primary Court (FAC), Tirupanmalai, dismissed the petitioners' (defendants 1-5) interim petition seeking to examine the Revenue Survey Officer as a witness regarding property survey details. The court held that the petitioner's request was legally untenable, as the Survey Officer can only testify based on official records and survey maps (S.A. 4 plan), not independently. The original case, pending since 2010, involves a land dispute among multiple parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The Primary Court (FAC), Tirupanmalai, dismissed the petitioners' (defendants 1-5) interim petition seeking to examine the Revenue Survey Officer as a witness regarding property survey details. The court held that the petitioner's request was legally untenable, as the Survey Officer can only testify based on official records and survey maps (S.A. 4 plan), not independently. The original case, pending since 2010, involves a land dispute among multiple parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts