P.Kaliappan vs District collector Madurai and 2 others Advocate - G.P.D1,D2, N.Namasivayam-D3 — 100486/2013
Case under Coalbearingareas(acquisitionanddevelopment)amendmentandvalidationact Section Order7,Rule1. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD130002672013
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Date
05-08-2013
Registration No
100486/2013
Registration Date
20-08-2013
Court
District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam
Judge
1-Principal District Munsif,Thirumangalam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.Kaliappan
Adv. Seenivasa babu
Respondent(s)
District collector Madurai and 2 others Advocate - G.P.D1,D2, N.Namasivayam-D3
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Munsif,Thirumangalam
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 18-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 25-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 18-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: O.S. No. 486/2013, Principal District Munsif, Thirumangalam Document Type: Witness Deposition (recorded on 26.02.2026) Outcome: This is a witness deposition record, not a final judgment. The witness (Thiru E. Manikandan, B.A., B.L., Principal District Munsif FAC) recorded testimony regarding a land dispute involving property boundaries, road widths (7 feet vs. 10 feet), and conflicting survey records between O.S. No. 96/2002 and O.S. No. 131/2000. No order granting or denying relief is issued in this document—it merely documents the witness's sworn statement and cross-examination responses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: O.S. No. 486/2013, Principal District Munsif, Thirumangalam Document Type: Witness Deposition (recorded on 26.02.2026) Outcome: This is a witness deposition record, not a final judgment. The witness (Thiru E. Manikandan, B.A., B.L., Principal District Munsif FAC) recorded testimony regarding a land dispute involving property boundaries, road widths (7 feet vs. 10 feet), and conflicting survey records between O.S. No. 96/2002 and O.S. No. 131/2000. No order granting or denying relief is issued in this document—it merely documents the witness's sworn statement and cross-examination responses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts