Jeyaraman and others vs The state of Tamil Nadul, rep. its District Collector, Madurai. — 182/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD130001932023
Filing Number
254/2023
Filing Date
18-Jul-2023
Registration No
182/2023
Registration Date
18-Jul-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam
Judge
2-Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jeyaraman and others
Adv. M.Dhanapandian
-
2.Aasha
Adv. M.Dhanapandian
Respondent(s)
-
1.The state of Tamil Nadul, rep. its District Collector, Madurai.
-
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
-
3.The Tahsildar,
-
4.The Revenue Inspector
-
5.The Village Administrative Officer
Case History
-
23-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
16-Mar-2026
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
06-Feb-2026
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
19-Nov-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
10-Oct-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
01-Aug-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
16-Jun-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
03-Apr-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
18-Mar-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
20-Feb-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
01-Feb-2025
Trial
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
10-Jan-2025
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
-
10-Jan-2025
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Case 182/2023 Summary Interim Application 3/2023 - DISMISSED Petitioners Jeyaraman and Aasha sought an interim injunction to restrain the respondent revenue officials from interfering with their possession of property during the pendency of the main case. The Additional District Munsiff's Court (Thirumanagalam) rejected the petition, holding that petitioners failed to demonstrate: (1) a prima facie case with merit, and (2) irreparable loss if the injunction were denied. The court found no substantive evidence or documents supporting their claims and dismissed the interim application without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jan-2025
Issues
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
20-Dec-2024
Orders
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
10-Dec-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
20-Nov-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
15-Nov-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
16-Oct-2024
Issues
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
20-Sep-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
31-Jul-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
11-Jul-2024
IA Pending
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
01-Apr-2024
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
13-Feb-2024
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
30-Nov-2023
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
14-Sep-2023
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
-
18-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 182/2023
Case 182/2023 Summary Interim Application 3/2023 - DISMISSED Petitioners Jeyaraman and Aasha sought an interim injunction to restrain the respondent revenue officials from interfering with their possession of property during the pendency of the main case. The Additional District Munsiff's Court (Thirumanagalam) rejected the petition, holding that petitioners failed to demonstrate: (1) a prima facie case with merit, and (2) irreparable loss if the injunction were denied. The court found no substantive evidence or documents supporting their claims and dismissed the interim application without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts