Seethalakshi vs The Tashildar, Thirumangalam and 2 others Advocate - Government Pleader — 100093/2012
Case under Coalbearingareas(acquisitionanddevelopment)amendmentandvalidationact Section Order7Rule1. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 18th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD130001772012
Filing Date
25-01-2012
Registration No
100093/2012
Registration Date
25-01-2012
Court
District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam
Judge
1-Principal District Munsif,Thirumangalam
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Seethalakshi
Adv. M. Dhanapandian
Respondent(s)
The Tashildar, Thirumangalam and 2 others Advocate - Government Pleader
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Munsif,Thirumangalam
Disposed
Evidence
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Amendment |
| 04-03-2026 | Amendment |
| 19-02-2026 | Amendment |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 100093/2012 Summary: Seethalakshmi filed a suit seeking declaration and permanent injunction against the Tashildar, Revenue Divisional Officer, State of Tamil Nadu, and four private individuals concerning a land property in Tirumangalam Taluk. The suit, filed in January 2012 with a cause of action from June 2007, remained pending for over 14 years. On 18 March 2026, the court dismissed the suit for default after the plaintiff failed to appear for trial despite being given sufficient opportunities, and the plaintiff's side was not ready to proceed with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case 100093/2012 Summary: Seethalakshmi filed a suit seeking declaration and permanent injunction against the Tashildar, Revenue Divisional Officer, State of Tamil Nadu, and four private individuals concerning a land property in Tirumangalam Taluk. The suit, filed in January 2012 with a cause of action from June 2007, remained pending for over 14 years. On 18 March 2026, the court dismissed the suit for default after the plaintiff failed to appear for trial despite being given sufficient opportunities, and the plaintiff's side was not ready to proceed with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts