Gurunathan vs Alagammal and 3 others Advocate - A.Kannaiah — 100555/2013
Case under Coalbearingareas(acquisitionanddevelopment)amendmentandvalidationact Section Order7,Rule1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD130001472013
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
25-09-2013
Registration No
100555/2013
Registration Date
25-09-2013
Court
District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam
Judge
1-Principal District Munsif,Thirumangalam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gurunathan
Adv. G.Adaikkalam
Respondent(s)
Alagammal and 3 others Advocate - A.Kannaiah
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Munsif,Thirumangalam
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: O.S.No.555/2013 | Court: Principal District Munsif, Thirumangalam Outcome: This is a deposition/witness examination record (not a final judgment). The witness Indrani was cross-examined on 18.03.2026 regarding a property dispute involving two plaintiffs and two defendants (Azhagammal and Azagu). The witness testified about family property matters, inheritance documents, and a 25-year-old deed, with several portions of her testimony recorded as lacking direct knowledge. The deposition concluded at 5:00 p.m. with no court order granting/denying relief, as this is merely a procedural witness statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: O.S.No.555/2013 | Court: Principal District Munsif, Thirumangalam Outcome: This is a deposition/witness examination record (not a final judgment). The witness Indrani was cross-examined on 18.03.2026 regarding a property dispute involving two plaintiffs and two defendants (Azhagammal and Azagu). The witness testified about family property matters, inheritance documents, and a 25-year-old deed, with several portions of her testimony recorded as lacking direct knowledge. The deposition concluded at 5:00 p.m. with no court order granting/denying relief, as this is merely a procedural witness statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts