Palani vs Senpakarajan — 124/2024

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(c). Status: Issues. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMD130001462024

Issues

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

Filing Number

175/2024

Filing Date

03-06-2024

Registration No

124/2024

Registration Date

03-06-2024

Court

District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam

Judge

2-Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

Palani

Adv. A.Velusamy

Respondent(s)

Senpakarajan

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam

12-03-2026

Issues

17-12-2025

Issues

16-10-2025

Issues

06-08-2025

Issues

29-07-2025

Orders

Interim Orders

06-08-2025
Copy of Judgment/Order

Case Summary Court: Additional District Munsif Court, Thirumanagalam (Tamil Nadu) Case: I.A.1/2024 in O.S. No. 124/2024 | Date: 06.08.2025 Outcome: The court dismissed the interim application for temporary injunction filed by the plaintiff (Palani) against the defendant (Senbhagarajan). The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate the necessary conditions under CPC Section 39(1,2) for granting interim relief, including failure to prove irreparable injury and balance of convenience in his favor. The court noted absence of oral or documentary evidence supporting the plaintiff's case and deferred the decision on permanent injunction relief to the final judgment of the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court: Additional District Munsif Court, Thirumanagalam (Tamil Nadu) Case: I.A.1/2024 in O.S. No. 124/2024 | Date: 06.08.2025 Outcome: The court dismissed the interim application for temporary injunction filed by the plaintiff (Palani) against the defendant (Senbhagarajan). The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate the necessary conditions under CPC Section 39(1,2) for granting interim relief, including failure to prove irreparable injury and balance of convenience in his favor. The court noted absence of oral or documentary evidence supporting the plaintiff's case and deferred the decision on permanent injunction relief to the final judgment of the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case