Palani vs Senpakarajan — 124/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(c). Status: Issues. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD130001462024
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
175/2024
Filing Date
03-06-2024
Registration No
124/2024
Registration Date
03-06-2024
Court
District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam
Judge
2-Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Palani
Adv. A.Velusamy
Respondent(s)
Senpakarajan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
Orders
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Issues |
| 17-12-2025 | Issues |
| 16-10-2025 | Issues |
| 06-08-2025 | Issues |
| 29-07-2025 | Orders |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Court: Additional District Munsif Court, Thirumanagalam (Tamil Nadu) Case: I.A.1/2024 in O.S. No. 124/2024 | Date: 06.08.2025 Outcome: The court dismissed the interim application for temporary injunction filed by the plaintiff (Palani) against the defendant (Senbhagarajan). The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate the necessary conditions under CPC Section 39(1,2) for granting interim relief, including failure to prove irreparable injury and balance of convenience in his favor. The court noted absence of oral or documentary evidence supporting the plaintiff's case and deferred the decision on permanent injunction relief to the final judgment of the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court: Additional District Munsif Court, Thirumanagalam (Tamil Nadu) Case: I.A.1/2024 in O.S. No. 124/2024 | Date: 06.08.2025 Outcome: The court dismissed the interim application for temporary injunction filed by the plaintiff (Palani) against the defendant (Senbhagarajan). The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate the necessary conditions under CPC Section 39(1,2) for granting interim relief, including failure to prove irreparable injury and balance of convenience in his favor. The court noted absence of oral or documentary evidence supporting the plaintiff's case and deferred the decision on permanent injunction relief to the final judgment of the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts