Baskaran and 1 another vs Sigghu.The.Indira Advocate - L.Mahadevan — 100334/2011
Case under Coalbearingareas(acquisitionanddevelopment)amendmentandvalidationact Section Order7,Rule1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD130001142011
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
22-07-2011
Registration No
100334/2011
Registration Date
22-07-2011
Court
District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam
Judge
1-Principal District Munsif,Thirumangalam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Baskaran and 1 another
Adv. J.Suresh Kumar
Respondent(s)
Sigghu.The.Indira Advocate - L.Mahadevan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Munsif,Thirumangalam
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition record (not a final court order) from O.S. No. 334/2011 in the Principal District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam, recorded on 19.02.2026. The witness (the defendant's husband) testified under cross-examination regarding a loan agreement dated 25.06.2009 involving Rs. 50,000, his wife's involvement in the case, and claims about loan repayment arrangements. The witness denied several allegations and provided his testimony on various disputed facts in the civil suit. This is a procedural record of witness examination, not a final judgment or order disposing of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition record (not a final court order) from O.S. No. 334/2011 in the Principal District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam, recorded on 19.02.2026. The witness (the defendant's husband) testified under cross-examination regarding a loan agreement dated 25.06.2009 involving Rs. 50,000, his wife's involvement in the case, and claims about loan repayment arrangements. The witness denied several allegations and provided his testimony on various disputed facts in the civil suit. This is a procedural record of witness examination, not a final judgment or order disposing of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts