K.Pandian vs Jeyaganathan Advocate - O.Chandran — 86/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 25(d). Status: Additional Issues. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD130000992022
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
142/2022
Filing Date
04-04-2022
Registration No
86/2022
Registration Date
04-04-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam
Judge
2-Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.Pandian
Adv. M.Dhanapandian
Respondent(s)
Jeyaganathan Advocate - O.Chandran
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District Munsif, Thirumangalam
Additional Issues
Additional Issues
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Additional Issues | |
| 11-02-2026 | Additional Issues | |
| 19-12-2025 | IA Pending | |
| 06-10-2025 | IA Pending | |
| 01-08-2025 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Additional District Munsif Court in Tirumanglam, by order dated 11.02.2026, allowed the Interlocutory Application (I.A. 3/2025) filed by defendants/respondents seeking permission to file an additional counter-claim in Original Suit No. 86/2022 concerning immovable property. The court found the application legally valid and permissible, noting that important documents related to the property dispute necessitated the filing of supplementary pleadings. However, the defendants were directed to pay costs of ₹500 to the plaintiff/opposite party within 10 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional District Munsif Court in Tirumanglam, by order dated 11.02.2026, allowed the Interlocutory Application (I.A. 3/2025) filed by defendants/respondents seeking permission to file an additional counter-claim in Original Suit No. 86/2022 concerning immovable property. The court found the application legally valid and permissible, noting that important documents related to the property dispute necessitated the filing of supplementary pleadings. However, the defendants were directed to pay costs of ₹500 to the plaintiff/opposite party within 10 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts