S.S. Colony P.s. vs Sakthivel and others — 740/2024
Case under Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Acts 2003 Section 24(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNMD010106282024
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
8640/2024
Filing Date
16-12-2024
Registration No
740/2024
Registration Date
16-12-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
10-IV Additional District and sessions Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
446
Police Station
S.S. Colony Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.S. Colony P.s.
Respondent(s)
Sakthivel and others
Bharathi
Hearing History
Judge: 10-IV Additional District and sessions Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary of S.C. No. 740/2024: This document records the deposition of Prosecution Witness (P.W.3) in the Madurai IV Additional District & Sessions Court on 01.12.2025. The witness testified regarding the arrest of two accused (Sakthivel and Bharathi) on 15.07.2024, when police intercepted a vehicle containing drug paraphernalia—white packets with cannabis—which the accused allegedly purchased in Bangalore and were sending via courier. The defence cross-examination challenged investigative procedures, including the lack of chemical analysis samples, absence of independent witnesses, and discrepancies in evidence documentation. No re-examination was conducted. The case remains under trial with witness testimony recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of S.C. No. 740/2024: This document records the deposition of Prosecution Witness (P.W.3) in the Madurai IV Additional District & Sessions Court on 01.12.2025. The witness testified regarding the arrest of two accused (Sakthivel and Bharathi) on 15.07.2024, when police intercepted a vehicle containing drug paraphernalia—white packets with cannabis—which the accused allegedly purchased in Bangalore and were sending via courier. The defence cross-examination challenged investigative procedures, including the lack of chemical analysis samples, absence of independent witnesses, and discrepancies in evidence documentation. No re-examination was conducted. The case remains under trial with witness testimony recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts