M. Kannan vs Kumarandi — 133/2021
Case under Guardians & Wards Act, 1890 Section 7,10,25. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 07th August 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNMD010052092021
Next Hearing
07th August 2026
Filing Number
1845/2021
Filing Date
12-07-2021
Registration No
133/2021
Registration Date
19-07-2021
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
2-I Additional District and Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M. Kannan
Adv. S. Balakrishnan
K. Selvi
Respondent(s)
Kumarandi
K. Sunthammal
Hearing History
Judge: 2-I Additional District and Sessions Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 133/2021 Date: 25.08.2025 This guardianship case involved K. Sunthammal (respondent) testifying regarding the welfare of minor children. The court examined claims concerning compensation received following the death of a son (₹30,00,000 and ₹5,00,000), property purchased (valued at ₹30 lakhs), and allegations that funds were misused. Sunthammal refuted claims that she neglected child care or that the respondents failed to provide proper support, asserting the family maintained the children's education and welfare. The Additional District Judge (G. Muthukumaran) recorded the testimony and cross-examination in open court, confirming the witness statement as accurate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 133/2021 Date: 25.08.2025 This guardianship case involved K. Sunthammal (respondent) testifying regarding the welfare of minor children. The court examined claims concerning compensation received following the death of a son (₹30,00,000 and ₹5,00,000), property purchased (valued at ₹30 lakhs), and allegations that funds were misused. Sunthammal refuted claims that she neglected child care or that the respondents failed to provide proper support, asserting the family maintained the children's education and welfare. The Additional District Judge (G. Muthukumaran) recorded the testimony and cross-examination in open court, confirming the witness statement as accurate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts