South Gate P.s., 739/2015 vs Pandeeswaran — 100336/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 366(A),465,468. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNMD010039342018

Evidence

Next Hearing

26th May 2026

Filing Number

43623/2018

Filing Date

28-06-2018

Registration No

100336/2018

Registration Date

28-06-2018

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

9-Sessions Judge, Mahila Court

FIR Details

FIR Number

739

Police Station

South Gate Police Station

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 366(A),465,468
PROHIBITION OF CHILD MARRIAGE ACT 2006 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

South Gate P.s., 739/2015

Adv. Tmt.C.Lathashanthi, Spl.PP

Respondent(s)

Pandeeswaran

Hearing History

Judge: 9-Sessions Judge, Mahila Court

07-05-2026

Evidence

09-04-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

12-02-2026

Evidence

12-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

18-09-2025
Copy of Deposition

This is a witness deposition (PW 5) in Sessions Court, Madurai (Case No. SC 336/2018) recorded on 18.09.2025. The witness, a retired school teacher, testified about issuing a school certificate and transfer certificate to a student named Ruswana, confirming her date of birth as 07.07.1998 based on school records. Cross-examination revealed discrepancies in the transfer certificate where the digit "8" in "1998" appeared to be overwritten, though the witness maintained the information was provided correctly and the original documents were issued without alterations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a witness deposition (PW 5) in Sessions Court, Madurai (Case No. SC 336/2018) recorded on 18.09.2025. The witness, a retired school teacher, testified about issuing a school certificate and transfer certificate to a student named Ruswana, confirming her date of birth as 07.07.1998 based on school records. Cross-examination revealed discrepancies in the transfer certificate where the digit "8" in "1998" appeared to be overwritten, though the witness maintained the information was provided correctly and the original documents were issued without alterations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Madurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case