N Angupandi vs T Valliammai Jeyanthi — 11/2025
Case under The Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 Section 38. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 10th June 2026.
RTA - Rent Tribunal Appeal
CNR: TNMD010019942025
e-Filing Number
20-03-2025
Filing Number
441/2025
Filing Date
20-03-2025
Registration No
11/2025
Registration Date
21-03-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
2-I Additional District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
N Angupandi
Adv. YOGAMANI JAMUNARANI S
Respondent(s)
T Valliammai Jeyanthi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-I Additional District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-06-2026 | Judgement |
| 04-06-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: R.T.A. No. 11/2025 (Angupandi v. Valliammai) The appellate tribunal dismissed tenant Angupandi's appeal against the rent court's eviction order. The landlord sought eviction under the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017, citing non-registration of the written tenancy agreement dated 25.12.2019. The court upheld eviction, holding that failure to register the agreement as mandated under Section 4(2) constitutes valid grounds for eviction under Section 21(2)(a), and cases already decided cannot be dismissed solely on non-registration grounds per recent High Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.T.A. No. 11/2025 (Angupandi v. Valliammai) The appellate tribunal dismissed tenant Angupandi's appeal against the rent court's eviction order. The landlord sought eviction under the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017, citing non-registration of the written tenancy agreement dated 25.12.2019. The court upheld eviction, holding that failure to register the agreement as mandated under Section 4(2) constitutes valid grounds for eviction under Section 21(2)(a), and cases already decided cannot be dismissed solely on non-registration grounds per recent High Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts