Mattuthavani P.S. vs Prakash Kumar Advocate - AROKIYA SELVA RAMESH S — 1160/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010019102026

Filing Number

1504/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1160/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

Mattuthavani Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

1.Mattuthavani P.S.

Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

1.Prakash Kumar Advocate - AROKIYA SELVA RAMESH S

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
24-Mar-2026

Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

Case Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed Prakash Kumar's bail petition under BNSS Section 483. The accused was charged with robbery, criminal intimidation, and wrongful restraint (BNS Sections 309(4), 311, 351(3)) allegedly committed on 03.03.2026 and had been in judicial custody for 20 days. The court rejected bail, citing the accused's four prior criminal cases in 2026, recovery of case properties from co-accused A1, ongoing investigation at a material stage, and recent involvement in criminal activities including vehicle theft cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
24-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal District and Sessions Judge
18-Mar-2026

Enquiry

Principal District and Sessions Judge
16-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
11-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 1160/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed Prakash Kumar's bail petition under BNSS Section 483. The accused was charged with robbery, criminal intimidation, and wrongful restraint (BNS Sections 309(4), 311, 351(3)) allegedly committed on 03.03.2026 and had been in judicial custody for 20 days. The court rejected bail, citing the accused's four prior criminal cases in 2026, recovery of case properties from co-accused A1, ongoing investigation at a material stage, and recent involvement in criminal activities including vehicle theft cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.