Usilampatti Taluka Ps. vs Thavamani Advocate - AROCKIA SELVAN R — 1147/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(1). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010019072026

Filing Number

1501/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1147/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

Usilampatti Taluk Police Sttaion

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(1)

Petitioner(s)

1.Usilampatti Taluka Ps (Police Station).

Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

1.Thavamani Advocate - AROCKIA SELVAN R

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
16-Mar-2026

Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.1147/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai allowed the petitioner Thavamani's petition to relax bail conditions imposed in an earlier order. The court found that the petitioner had complied with daily police reporting for 27 consecutive days, was the sole earning member of his family, and faced financial hardship. Since investigation was nearly complete and the public prosecutor did not contest the compliance record, the court totally relaxed the reporting condition. The petitioner must now appear only on court summons and cooperate for case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
16-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal District and Sessions Judge
11-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 1147/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.1147/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai allowed the petitioner Thavamani's petition to relax bail conditions imposed in an earlier order. The court found that the petitioner had complied with daily police reporting for 27 consecutive days, was the sole earning member of his family, and faced financial hardship. Since investigation was nearly complete and the public prosecutor did not contest the compliance record, the court totally relaxed the reporting condition. The petitioner must now appear only on court summons and cooperate for case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.