Teppakulam P.S. vs Vijay Advocate - VETRIVEL R — 1151/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMD010019042026
Filing Number
1498/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
1151/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
64
Police Station
Teppakulam Police Stataion
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Teppakulam P.S.
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
Vijay Advocate - VETRIVEL R
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 1151/2026 Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed Vijay's bail petition under BNSS Section 483 in a house-breaking and theft case (Crime No. 64/2026). The court rejected bail despite the petitioner's argument that he was falsely implicated merely for standing near another accused, citing incomplete investigation, non-recovery of stolen items (gold stud, silver ring, cash), and prosecution's strong objections as grounds for detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 1151/2026 Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed Vijay's bail petition under BNSS Section 483 in a house-breaking and theft case (Crime No. 64/2026). The court rejected bail despite the petitioner's argument that he was falsely implicated merely for standing near another accused, citing incomplete investigation, non-recovery of stolen items (gold stud, silver ring, cash), and prosecution's strong objections as grounds for detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts