Keelavalavu P.s. vs Pandi Advocate - RAMAR M — 1148/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(1). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010019022026

Filing Number

1496/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1148/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

198

Police Station

Keelavalavu Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Keelavalavu P.s.

    Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pandi Advocate - RAMAR M

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.1148/2026 The court allowed the petitioner Pandi's petition to relax bail conditions imposed in January 2026. The petitioner, charged under BNS sections 103(1), 191(2), 191(3), and 49, had complied with daily police reporting for 61 consecutive days as the sole family earner. The court granted total relaxation of the condition, finding the petitioner's consistent compliance and hardship sufficient grounds, while noting investigation completion and the State's concession that chargesheet remained unfiled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1148/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.1148/2026 The court allowed the petitioner Pandi's petition to relax bail conditions imposed in January 2026. The petitioner, charged under BNS sections 103(1), 191(2), 191(3), and 49, had complied with daily police reporting for 61 consecutive days as the sole family earner. The court granted total relaxation of the condition, finding the petitioner's consistent compliance and hardship sufficient grounds, while noting investigation completion and the State's concession that chargesheet remained unfiled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case