Jaihindpuram P.s. vs Santhosh kumar Advocate - JEGADEESAN P — 1153/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010019012026

Filing Number

1495/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1153/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

88

Police Station

Jaihindpuram Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jaihindpuram P.s.

    Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Santhosh kumar Advocate - JEGADEESAN P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.1153/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted bail to Santhoshkumar, accused under Sections 30 & 25(1A) of the Arms Act for possessing a sword (50 cm) with intent to commit robbery. The court considered that the petitioner had been in custody for 30 days, material investigation was largely complete, and this was his second petition, warranting bail on conditions rather than continued detention. The petitioner was released on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties of like amount, subject to daily reporting to police at 10:00 a.m., cooperation with investigation, non-intimidation of witnesses, and abstention from similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1153/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.1153/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted bail to Santhoshkumar, accused under Sections 30 & 25(1A) of the Arms Act for possessing a sword (50 cm) with intent to commit robbery. The court considered that the petitioner had been in custody for 30 days, material investigation was largely complete, and this was his second petition, warranting bail on conditions rather than continued detention. The petitioner was released on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties of like amount, subject to daily reporting to police at 10:00 a.m., cooperation with investigation, non-intimidation of witnesses, and abstention from similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case