Vane vs Melur P.s. Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — 1169/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010018832026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

1477/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1169/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

50

Police Station

Melur P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vane

    Adv. RAMAN A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Melur P.s. Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.1169/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Vane (A2) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(2) read with Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act. The court considered that the injured party was discharged from hospital, the co-accused (A1) had already been granted bail, material investigation was largely complete, and the petitioner had no prior criminal record. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, court surrender within 15 days, daily police reporting for 15 days at 10:00 a.m., and cooperation with investigation without intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1169/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.1169/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Vane (A2) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(2) read with Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act. The court considered that the injured party was discharged from hospital, the co-accused (A1) had already been granted bail, material investigation was largely complete, and the petitioner had no prior criminal record. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, court surrender within 15 days, daily police reporting for 15 days at 10:00 a.m., and cooperation with investigation without intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case