Panaselvam vs Sindhupatti P.s. Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — 1167/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010018812026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

1475/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1167/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

31

Police Station

Sindupatti Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Panaselvam

    Adv. GANESH PANDI G.

  2. 2.Jeya

    Adv. GANESH PANDI G.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sindhupatti P.s. Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 1167/2026 Panaselvam and Jeya filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 in the Principal Sessions Judge's Court at Madurai in connection with Criminal Case No. 31/2026 at Sindhupatti P.S., involving alleged offences under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3) of BNS. The court dismissed the petition as the petitioners' counsel chose not to press it and filed a withdrawal memo accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1167/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1167/2026 Panaselvam and Jeya filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 in the Principal Sessions Judge's Court at Madurai in connection with Criminal Case No. 31/2026 at Sindhupatti P.S., involving alleged offences under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), and 351(3) of BNS. The court dismissed the petition as the petitioners' counsel chose not to press it and filed a withdrawal memo accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case