Anna Nagar P.s. vs Raghuram Advocate - SOLAI RAJA P — 1122/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010018642026

Filing Number

1459/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

1122/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

96

Police Station

Anna Nagar Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anna Nagar P.s.

    Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Raghuram Advocate - SOLAI RAJA P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.1122/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed bail petitions filed by Raghuram and two other accused charged with murder (Cr.No.96/2026). The accused were arrested for brutally assaulting a man on 11.02.2026, resulting in his death, with charges under BNS sections including 103(1) (murder). The court rejected arguments of false implication and lack of direct evidence, finding the investigation at an early stage in a heinous crime, warranting continued custody pending further investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1122/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.1122/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed bail petitions filed by Raghuram and two other accused charged with murder (Cr.No.96/2026). The accused were arrested for brutally assaulting a man on 11.02.2026, resulting in his death, with charges under BNS sections including 103(1) (murder). The court rejected arguments of false implication and lack of direct evidence, finding the investigation at an early stage in a heinous crime, warranting continued custody pending further investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case