Thiru Nagar P.s. vs Vijay @ Veeragowtham Advocate - SULTHAN ALAVUDEEN M — 1123/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010018632026

Filing Number

1458/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

1123/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

Thiru Nagar Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

1.Thiru Nagar P.s.

Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

1.Vijay @ Veeragowtham Advocate - SULTHAN ALAVUDEEN M

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
16-Mar-2026

Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.1123/2026 The court granted bail to Vijay @ Veeragowtham, arrested for illegal possession of a sword under Section 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act. The judge found that the accused had been in custody for 29 days, investigation was substantially complete, and he had only one unrelated prior case from 2019, warranting conditional bail rather than continued detention. The petitioner was released on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, subject to daily reporting to police at 10:00 a.m., cooperation with investigation, non-interference with witnesses, and prohibition from committing similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
16-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal District and Sessions Judge
13-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
10-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 1123/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.1123/2026 The court granted bail to Vijay @ Veeragowtham, arrested for illegal possession of a sword under Section 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act. The judge found that the accused had been in custody for 29 days, investigation was substantially complete, and he had only one unrelated prior case from 2019, warranting conditional bail rather than continued detention. The petitioner was released on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, subject to daily reporting to police at 10:00 a.m., cooperation with investigation, non-interference with witnesses, and prohibition from committing similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.