Balamurugan vs Inspector of Police, Uthappanaickanur, Madurai — 1114/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010018512026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1447/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

1114/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

2-I Additional District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

42

Police Station

Uthappanayakkanur P.S.

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Balamurugan

Respondent(s)

Inspector of Police, Uthappanaickanur, Madurai

Hearing History

Judge: 2-I Additional District and Sessions Judge

18-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

Compliance

16-03-2026

Compliance

13-03-2026

Compliance

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Case Summary: Crmp No.1114/2026 The I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madurai granted bail to Balamurugan, who was arrested on a non-bailable warrant after failing to appear in court on 27.10.2025, and had been in judicial custody since 21.01.2026. The court found that despite the prosecution's argument that the accused had three pending cases and posed an absconding risk, the petitioner's status as family breadwinner and the prolonged detention (56+ days) with trial completion still pending justified release on stringent conditions. The accused was ordered to execute a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, appear weekly before the Judicial Magistrate, refrain from committing similar offences, not tamper with evidence, and furnish contact details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crmp No.1114/2026 The I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madurai granted bail to Balamurugan, who was arrested on a non-bailable warrant after failing to appear in court on 27.10.2025, and had been in judicial custody since 21.01.2026. The court found that despite the prosecution's argument that the accused had three pending cases and posed an absconding risk, the petitioner's status as family breadwinner and the prolonged detention (56+ days) with trial completion still pending justified release on stringent conditions. The accused was ordered to execute a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, appear weekly before the Judicial Magistrate, refrain from committing similar offences, not tamper with evidence, and furnish contact details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Madurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case