Balamurugan vs Inspector of Police, Uthappanaickanur, Madurai — 1114/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMD010018512026
Filing Number
1447/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
1114/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
2-I Additional District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
42
Police Station
Uthappanayakkanur P.S.
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Balamurugan
Respondent(s)
Inspector of Police, Uthappanaickanur, Madurai
Hearing History
Judge: 2-I Additional District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 16-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 13-03-2026 | Compliance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Crmp No.1114/2026 The I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madurai granted bail to Balamurugan, who was arrested on a non-bailable warrant after failing to appear in court on 27.10.2025, and had been in judicial custody since 21.01.2026. The court found that despite the prosecution's argument that the accused had three pending cases and posed an absconding risk, the petitioner's status as family breadwinner and the prolonged detention (56+ days) with trial completion still pending justified release on stringent conditions. The accused was ordered to execute a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, appear weekly before the Judicial Magistrate, refrain from committing similar offences, not tamper with evidence, and furnish contact details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crmp No.1114/2026 The I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madurai granted bail to Balamurugan, who was arrested on a non-bailable warrant after failing to appear in court on 27.10.2025, and had been in judicial custody since 21.01.2026. The court found that despite the prosecution's argument that the accused had three pending cases and posed an absconding risk, the petitioner's status as family breadwinner and the prolonged detention (56+ days) with trial completion still pending justified release on stringent conditions. The accused was ordered to execute a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, appear weekly before the Judicial Magistrate, refrain from committing similar offences, not tamper with evidence, and furnish contact details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts