Yasmin Alais Yasmin Sheriffa I vs Tallakulam P.s. Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — 1171/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 17th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMD010018462026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
1443/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
1171/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
129
Police Station
Tallakulam Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yasmin Alais Yasmin Sheriffa I
Adv. KANNAN R
Respondent(s)
Tallakulam P.s. Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 1171/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of Yasmin Alais Yasmin Sheriffa (petitioner/Accused-3) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating). The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, following instructions from Accused-1, collected a 13-sovereign gold chain from the complainant and handed it to Accused-1; neither the promised ₹1 crore loan was arranged nor the ₹30 lacs or gold chain was returned. The court found the petitioner's specific overt act, the pending investigation stage, and strong prosecution objections warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1171/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of Yasmin Alais Yasmin Sheriffa (petitioner/Accused-3) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating). The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, following instructions from Accused-1, collected a 13-sovereign gold chain from the complainant and handed it to Accused-1; neither the promised ₹1 crore loan was arranged nor the ₹30 lacs or gold chain was returned. The court found the petitioner's specific overt act, the pending investigation stage, and strong prosecution objections warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts