Thirupparankundram PS vs Kanimurugan Advocate - PRAKASH R — 1108/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(1). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010018242026

Filing Number

1426/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

1108/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11

Police Station

Tirupparankundrum Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Thirupparankundram PS (Police Station)

    Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kanimurugan Advocate - PRAKASH R

  2. 2.Arul Jothi Kani @ Jeeva

    Adv. PRAKASH R

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted the petition filed by Kanimurugan and Arul Jothi Kani, accused in a case involving offences under BNS sections 296(b), 351(2) and TNPWH Act section 4, to completely relax the stringent bail conditions. The court found that the petitioners, who are employed, had faithfully complied with twice-daily police station reporting for 14 days, and since the charge sheet had not yet been filed, relaxation was justified. The accused are now required only to appear before the concerned court on summons and cooperate for early case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1108/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted the petition filed by Kanimurugan and Arul Jothi Kani, accused in a case involving offences under BNS sections 296(b), 351(2) and TNPWH Act section 4, to completely relax the stringent bail conditions. The court found that the petitioners, who are employed, had faithfully complied with twice-daily police station reporting for 14 days, and since the charge sheet had not yet been filed, relaxation was justified. The accused are now required only to appear before the concerned court on summons and cooperate for early case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case