South Gate P.s. vs Praveenkumar Advocate - MAHARAJAN V — 1105/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010018212026

Filing Number

1423/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

1105/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

43

Police Station

South Gate Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.South Gate P.s.

    Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Praveenkumar Advocate - MAHARAJAN V

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted bail to Praveenkumar, accused under Sections 5 & 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act for unlawful possession of a sword, after 31 days in custody. The court considered that investigation was substantially complete and imposed strict conditions including daily police check-ins, cooperation with investigation, non-commission of similar offences, and a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1105/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted bail to Praveenkumar, accused under Sections 5 & 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act for unlawful possession of a sword, after 31 days in custody. The court considered that investigation was substantially complete and imposed strict conditions including daily police check-ins, cooperation with investigation, non-commission of similar offences, and a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case