Koodal Pudur P.s. vs Vinith Advocate - NANDHINI K — 1098/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMD010018172026
Filing Number
1419/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
1098/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
93
Police Station
Koodal Pudur P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Koodal Pudur P.s.
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vinith Advocate - NANDHINI K
-
2.Selvaraj
Adv. NANDHINI K
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted bail to two accused (Vinith and Selvaraj) arrested for illegal possession of lethal weapons under Section 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act, considering their 22-day incarceration and substantially completed investigation. The accused were released on Rs.10,000 bail each with two sureties, subject to conditions including daily police reporting for 15 days, cooperation with investigation, and non-commission of similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1098/2026
The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted bail to two accused (Vinith and Selvaraj) arrested for illegal possession of lethal weapons under Section 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act, considering their 22-day incarceration and substantially completed investigation. The accused were released on Rs.10,000 bail each with two sureties, subject to conditions including daily police reporting for 15 days, cooperation with investigation, and non-commission of similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts