CSCID Madurai City vs Jithu Advocate - DHANDAPANI T — 1099/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010018162026

Filing Number

1418/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

1099/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

51

Police Station

CSCID Madurai

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CSCID Madurai City

    Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jithu Advocate - DHANDAPANI T

  2. 2.Adithyan

    Adv. DHANDAPANI T

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Summary The Madurai Principal Sessions Judge dismissed the bail petition of two accused (Jithu and Adithyan) charged under the Tamil Nadu Sugarcane (Regulation of Distribution and Commerce) Act and Essential Commodities Act for transporting 10,619 kgs of public distribution system rice without authorization. The court denied bail citing the seriousness of the offence, ongoing investigation, risk of absconding (as they are Kerala natives), and the main accused still being at large. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1099/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Madurai Principal Sessions Judge dismissed the bail petition of two accused (Jithu and Adithyan) charged under the Tamil Nadu Sugarcane (Regulation of Distribution and Commerce) Act and Essential Commodities Act for transporting 10,619 kgs of public distribution system rice without authorization. The court denied bail citing the seriousness of the offence, ongoing investigation, risk of absconding (as they are Kerala natives), and the main accused still being at large. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case