Karuppyaurani P.s. vs Jeya Advocate - MEYAPPAN — 1101/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010018142026

Filing Number

1416/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

1101/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

16

Police Station

Karuppyaurani Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Karuppyaurani P.s.

    Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jeya Advocate - MEYAPPAN

  2. 2.Lakshmipriya

    Adv. MEYAPPAN

  3. 3.Banupriya

    Adv. MEYAPPAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Summary The Principal Sessions Judge of Madurai dismissed bail petitions filed by five accused persons charged under BNS sections 191(2), 296(b), and 105 in a death case. The court found that the investigation was still pending at a preliminary stage with final forensic reports awaited, and the cause of death—whether cardiac arrest or assault—remained uncertain, necessitating continued custody for investigation purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1101/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge of Madurai dismissed bail petitions filed by five accused persons charged under BNS sections 191(2), 296(b), and 105 in a death case. The court found that the investigation was still pending at a preliminary stage with final forensic reports awaited, and the cause of death—whether cardiac arrest or assault—remained uncertain, necessitating continued custody for investigation purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case