Inspector of Police T.Kallupatti PS vs Muthukumar Advocate - MARIMUTHU C — 1097/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010018132026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1415/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

1097/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

FIR Details

FIR Number

30

Police Station

T.Kallupatti Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Inspector of Police T.Kallupatti PS (Police Station)

Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

Muthukumar Advocate - MARIMUTHU C

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

16-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed the bail petition of Muthu Kumar under Section 483 of BNSS, who was arrested for allegedly assaulting the complainant with an Aruval (sickle) causing injuries to his hand and wrist on 10.02.2026 (charges under BNS Sections 296(b), 333, and 109). The court rejected bail citing the pendency of a separate POCSO Act case against the accused involving the complainant's daughter, the risk of witness intimidation and evidence tampering, and the accused's criminal history. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed the bail petition of Muthu Kumar under Section 483 of BNSS, who was arrested for allegedly assaulting the complainant with an Aruval (sickle) causing injuries to his hand and wrist on 10.02.2026 (charges under BNS Sections 296(b), 333, and 109). The court rejected bail citing the pendency of a separate POCSO Act case against the accused involving the complainant's daughter, the risk of witness intimidation and evidence tampering, and the accused's criminal history. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Madurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case