CHANAKYAN K vs Thilagar Thidal A.W.P.S. Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — 1110/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010018032026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

1406/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

1110/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Partially Allowed

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

All Women Police Station - South

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

1.CHANAKYAN K

Adv. IYYASAMY M
2.P Krishnamoorthy

Adv. IYYASAMY M
3.K Vasantha

Adv. IYYASAMY M

Respondent(s)

1.Thilagar Thidal A.W.P.S. Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
10-Apr-2026

Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai partially granted anticipatory bail in a matrimonial dowry harassment case. The court denied anticipatory bail to petitioners 1 and 3 (husband and in-laws) based on allegations of dowry demands and unauthorized pledging of the complainant's jewelry and cash, but granted conditional anticipatory bail to petitioner 2 (father-in-law) with Rs.10,000 bond and daily police reporting for 30 days, finding limited direct involvement against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
10-Apr-2026

Disposed

Principal District and Sessions Judge
02-Apr-2026

Await Reports

Principal District and Sessions Judge
30-Mar-2026

Await Reports

Principal District and Sessions Judge
24-Mar-2026

Mediation

Principal District and Sessions Judge
17-Mar-2026

Mediation

Principal District and Sessions Judge
12-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
09-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 1110/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai partially granted anticipatory bail in a matrimonial dowry harassment case. The court denied anticipatory bail to petitioners 1 and 3 (husband and in-laws) based on allegations of dowry demands and unauthorized pledging of the complainant's jewelry and cash, but granted conditional anticipatory bail to petitioner 2 (father-in-law) with Rs.10,000 bond and daily police reporting for 30 days, finding limited direct involvement against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.