CHANAKYAN K vs Thilagar Thidal A.W.P.S. Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — 1110/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 10th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMD010018032026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
1406/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
1110/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Partially Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
7
Police Station
All Women Police Station - South
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHANAKYAN K
Adv. IYYASAMY M
P Krishnamoorthy
Adv. IYYASAMY M
K Vasantha
Adv. IYYASAMY M
Respondent(s)
Thilagar Thidal A.W.P.S. Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Await Reports
Await Reports
Mediation
Mediation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-04-2026 | Await Reports |
| 30-03-2026 | Await Reports |
| 24-03-2026 | Mediation |
| 17-03-2026 | Mediation |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai partially granted anticipatory bail in a matrimonial dowry harassment case. The court denied anticipatory bail to petitioners 1 and 3 (husband and in-laws) based on allegations of dowry demands and unauthorized pledging of the complainant's jewelry and cash, but granted conditional anticipatory bail to petitioner 2 (father-in-law) with Rs.10,000 bond and daily police reporting for 30 days, finding limited direct involvement against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai partially granted anticipatory bail in a matrimonial dowry harassment case. The court denied anticipatory bail to petitioners 1 and 3 (husband and in-laws) based on allegations of dowry demands and unauthorized pledging of the complainant's jewelry and cash, but granted conditional anticipatory bail to petitioner 2 (father-in-law) with Rs.10,000 bond and daily police reporting for 30 days, finding limited direct involvement against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts