Thirupparankundram PS vs Karmegam Advocate - SENTHIL KUMAR T — 1094/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMD010017942026
Filing Number
1400/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
1094/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
64
Police Station
Tirupparankundrum Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thirupparankundram PS (Police Station)
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
Karmegam Advocate - SENTHIL KUMAR T
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 11-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed Karmegam's bail petition under BNSS 2023. Karmegam was arrested on 02.03.2026 for possessing 50gms ganja, prohibited tobacco products, and a knife with intent to sell to school/college students, and charged under Arms Act, NDPS Act, Juvenile Justice Act, and COTPA. The court denied bail citing: serious offences against societal welfare and the rising generation, incomplete investigation, three prior criminal cases against the accused, and only 17 days of custody elapsed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed Karmegam's bail petition under BNSS 2023. Karmegam was arrested on 02.03.2026 for possessing 50gms ganja, prohibited tobacco products, and a knife with intent to sell to school/college students, and charged under Arms Act, NDPS Act, Juvenile Justice Act, and COTPA. The court denied bail citing: serious offences against societal welfare and the rising generation, incomplete investigation, three prior criminal cases against the accused, and only 17 days of custody elapsed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts