Inspector of Police City Crime Branch vs Purusothaman Advocate - CHANDRABOSE M — 1085/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 17th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMD010017892026
Filing Number
1395/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
1085/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
39
Police Station
CCB Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police City Crime Branch
Respondent(s)
Purusothaman Advocate - CHANDRABOSE M
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 11-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 1085/2026 The court dismissed the bail petition of Purushothaman and Muthulakshmi, who were arrested for alleged cheating and fraud offences under BNS sections 316(2), 318(4), 336(3), and 340(2). The accused were accused of defrauding a PWD contractor of ₹52.5 lakhs by falsely promising to obtain a ₹2 crore government contract using political influence, and fabricating fake contract orders. The court found the charges serious, investigation incomplete, no recovery made, prior similar criminal cases against the accused, and risk of absconding, therefore denying bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1085/2026 The court dismissed the bail petition of Purushothaman and Muthulakshmi, who were arrested for alleged cheating and fraud offences under BNS sections 316(2), 318(4), 336(3), and 340(2). The accused were accused of defrauding a PWD contractor of ₹52.5 lakhs by falsely promising to obtain a ₹2 crore government contract using political influence, and fabricating fake contract orders. The court found the charges serious, investigation incomplete, no recovery made, prior similar criminal cases against the accused, and risk of absconding, therefore denying bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts