Inspector of Police City Crime Branch vs Purusothaman Advocate - CHANDRABOSE M — 1085/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010017892026

Filing Number

1395/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

1085/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

39

Police Station

CCB Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police City Crime Branch

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Purusothaman Advocate - CHANDRABOSE M

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 1085/2026 The court dismissed the bail petition of Purushothaman and Muthulakshmi, who were arrested for alleged cheating and fraud offences under BNS sections 316(2), 318(4), 336(3), and 340(2). The accused were accused of defrauding a PWD contractor of ₹52.5 lakhs by falsely promising to obtain a ₹2 crore government contract using political influence, and fabricating fake contract orders. The court found the charges serious, investigation incomplete, no recovery made, prior similar criminal cases against the accused, and risk of absconding, therefore denying bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1085/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1085/2026 The court dismissed the bail petition of Purushothaman and Muthulakshmi, who were arrested for alleged cheating and fraud offences under BNS sections 316(2), 318(4), 336(3), and 340(2). The accused were accused of defrauding a PWD contractor of ₹52.5 lakhs by falsely promising to obtain a ₹2 crore government contract using political influence, and fabricating fake contract orders. The court found the charges serious, investigation incomplete, no recovery made, prior similar criminal cases against the accused, and risk of absconding, therefore denying bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case