High Court P.s. Madurai vs Yuvannaahul Advocate - ALAGURAJA M — 1083/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010017872026

Filing Number

1393/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

1083/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.High Court P.s. Madurai

    Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Yuvannaahul Advocate - ALAGURAJA M

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai, dismissed the bail petition of Yuvannaahul, a law student accused of stealing an iPad from a judge's chamber and a laptop from court premises under sections 331(3) and 305 of BNS and sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the IT Act. The court rejected the accused's pleas regarding mental depression and family hardship, noting medical certificates showed "nil specific complaints," and found the seriousness of the offences against court property and the incomplete investigation warranted continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1083/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai, dismissed the bail petition of Yuvannaahul, a law student accused of stealing an iPad from a judge's chamber and a laptop from court premises under sections 331(3) and 305 of BNS and sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the IT Act. The court rejected the accused's pleas regarding mental depression and family hardship, noting medical certificates showed "nil specific complaints," and found the seriousness of the offences against court property and the incomplete investigation warranted continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case