Thilagar Thidal P.s. vs Logesh alias Ganesh — 192/2025
Case under Arms Act, 1959 Section 25(1A). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNMD010017642025
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
1491/2025
Filing Date
11-03-2025
Registration No
192/2025
Registration Date
11-03-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
10-IV Additional District and sessions Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
60
Police Station
Thilagar Thidal Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thilagar Thidal P.s.
Respondent(s)
Logesh alias Ganesh
Hearing History
Judge: 10-IV Additional District and sessions Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 08-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case 192/2025 Summary: In this criminal case dated 16.03.2026, the court examined witness P.W.2 (Thiru. Bharathi) under Section 311 CrPC. The witness testified regarding a patrolling operation in Madurai and alleged recovery of an illegal firearm from the respondent (Logesh alias Ganesh). However, the witness admitted under cross-examination that no corroborating evidence was produced, no arrest was made, and the entire case details appeared fabricated. The court found the case circumstances suspicious and lacking credibility. The petition was dismissed and the case stands concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 192/2025 Summary: In this criminal case dated 16.03.2026, the court examined witness P.W.2 (Thiru. Bharathi) under Section 311 CrPC. The witness testified regarding a patrolling operation in Madurai and alleged recovery of an illegal firearm from the respondent (Logesh alias Ganesh). However, the witness admitted under cross-examination that no corroborating evidence was produced, no arrest was made, and the entire case details appeared fabricated. The court found the case circumstances suspicious and lacking credibility. The petition was dismissed and the case stands concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts