Avaniyapuram P.s. vs Balamurugan @ Murugan Advocate - KANNAN S — 1068/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010017272026

Filing Number

1346/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

1068/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

616

Police Station

Avaniyapuram Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Avaniyapuram P.s.

    Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Balamurugan @ Murugan Advocate - KANNAN S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed Balamurugan's bail petition under BNSS Section 483. The petitioner, arrested on 02.01.2026 for murder (Sections 296(b), 103, 351(3) BNS), was charged as A6 for allegedly transporting five primary accused with weapons to the murder site on 31.12.2025. The court denied bail citing: the heinous nature of the offence, incomplete investigation (only 15 witnesses examined, forensic and postmortem reports pending), risk of retaliation murder between rival groups, and insufficient custody period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1068/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Balamurugan's bail petition under BNSS Section 483. The petitioner, arrested on 02.01.2026 for murder (Sections 296(b), 103, 351(3) BNS), was charged as A6 for allegedly transporting five primary accused with weapons to the murder site on 31.12.2025. The court denied bail citing: the heinous nature of the offence, incomplete investigation (only 15 witnesses examined, forensic and postmortem reports pending), risk of retaliation murder between rival groups, and insufficient custody period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case