K.Pudur P.s. vs Srikanth Advocate - THANGARAJ S — 1055/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010016912026

Filing Number

1319/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

1055/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

55

Police Station

K.Pudur Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.Pudur P.s.

    Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Srikanth Advocate - THANGARAJ S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted bail to Srikanth, a college student accused under Section 25(1A) of the Arms Act for possessing a knife with criminal intent, after he spent 16 days in judicial custody. The court imposed conditions including daily police reporting for 15 days, cooperation with investigation, and a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, noting that material investigation should have been completed and no similar prior offence was pending against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1055/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted bail to Srikanth, a college student accused under Section 25(1A) of the Arms Act for possessing a knife with criminal intent, after he spent 16 days in judicial custody. The court imposed conditions including daily police reporting for 15 days, cooperation with investigation, and a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, noting that material investigation should have been completed and no similar prior offence was pending against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case