Inspector of Police Keeraithurai PS vs Vallal Gururayan Advocate - AROKIYA SELVA RAMESH S — 1056/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010016902026

Filing Number

1318/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

1056/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

64

Police Station

Keerathurai Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police Keeraithurai PS (Police Station)

    Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vallal Gururayan Advocate - AROKIYA SELVA RAMESH S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted bail to the accused Vallal Gururayan in a case involving criminal damage to six vehicles and criminal intimidation. The court found that after 45 days in custody, further interrogation was unnecessary, and considering his clean criminal record and student status, bail was warranted on stringent conditions including Rs. 5,000 deposit, Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1056/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted bail to the accused Vallal Gururayan in a case involving criminal damage to six vehicles and criminal intimidation. The court found that after 45 days in custody, further interrogation was unnecessary, and considering his clean criminal record and student status, bail was warranted on stringent conditions including Rs. 5,000 deposit, Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, daily police reporting for 30 days, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case