Omatchikulam P.s. vs Vishnu Advocate - NAGARAJ P — 1038/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 09th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMD010016592026
Filing Number
1292/2026
Filing Date
04-Mar-2026
Registration No
1038/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11
Police Station
Omatchikulam Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Omatchikulam P.s.
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vishnu Advocate - NAGARAJ P
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed the second bail petition filed by Vishnu (A2) under Section 483 of BNSS. The petitioner was accused of assaulting a Woman Head Constable in uniform on 09.02.2026, causing injuries, under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 121(1) of BNS and Section 4 of TNPWH Act. The court rejected the bail citing the seriousness of offences against law enforcement, the early stage of investigation with some accused still absconding, previous dismissal of similar petitions for co-accused, and no material change in circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1038/2026
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed the second bail petition filed by Vishnu (A2) under Section 483 of BNSS. The petitioner was accused of assaulting a Woman Head Constable in uniform on 09.02.2026, causing injuries, under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 121(1) of BNS and Section 4 of TNPWH Act. The court rejected the bail citing the seriousness of offences against law enforcement, the early stage of investigation with some accused still absconding, previous dismissal of similar petitions for co-accused, and no material change in circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts