Tallakulam P.s. vs Rajesh Advocate - SURESH P — 1034/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010016552026

Filing Number

1288/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

1034/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

114

Police Station

Tallakulam Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Tallakulam P.s.

    Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajesh Advocate - SURESH P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed the bail petition of Rajesh (accused in Crime No. 114/2026) under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023. The court rejected bail citing the serious nature of charges (robbery at knife point and criminal intimidation under BNS Sections 309(4), 311, 351(3)), early stage of investigation, petitioner's recent involvement in a separate Arms Act case, and strong prosecution objections, despite only 11 days of custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1034/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed the bail petition of Rajesh (accused in Crime No. 114/2026) under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023. The court rejected bail citing the serious nature of charges (robbery at knife point and criminal intimidation under BNS Sections 309(4), 311, 351(3)), early stage of investigation, petitioner's recent involvement in a separate Arms Act case, and strong prosecution objections, despite only 11 days of custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case