Elumalai P.S. vs Karnamaharaja Advocate - IYAPPAKATHIRVEL PAT S — 1001/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMD010016192026
Filing Number
1260/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
1001/2026
Registration Date
04-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
53
Police Station
Elumalai Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Elumalai P.S.
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Karnamaharaja Advocate - IYAPPAKATHIRVEL PAT S
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted bail to accused Karnamaharaja in a case involving charges under IPC sections 454, 380, 307, 506(ii), and 511. The court considered his 55-day incarceration, changed circumstances (case committed to Sessions court), and assurance of regular appearance, while imposing stringent conditions including weekly court appearances on Mondays, two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, and prohibition on committing similar offences or threatening witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1001/2026
The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai granted bail to accused Karnamaharaja in a case involving charges under IPC sections 454, 380, 307, 506(ii), and 511. The court considered his 55-day incarceration, changed circumstances (case committed to Sessions court), and assurance of regular appearance, while imposing stringent conditions including weekly court appearances on Mondays, two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, and prohibition on committing similar offences or threatening witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts