M. Ramraj vs The Inpsector of Police Uthappanaickanur P.S — 1175/2026
Case under Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 37. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMD010015892026
Filing Number
1237/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
1175/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
7-Spl. Judge for Communal Clash Cases
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
Police Station
Uthappanayakkanur P.S.
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M. Ramraj
Adv. SENTHILRAJAN D
Respondent(s)
The Inpsector of Police Uthappanaickanur P.S
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Spl. Judge for Communal Clash Cases
Disposed
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | Appearance |
| 08-04-2026 | Appearance |
| 07-04-2026 | Appearance |
| 26-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Madurai District and Sessions Court dismissed M. Ramraj's bail petition in an NDPS Act case (Crl.M.P. No. 1175/2026). The court found that Ramraj was absent from four consecutive court hearings (21.08.2023, 13.09.2023, 01.11.2023, 06.12.2023), leading to issuance of a non-bailable warrant (NBW) executed on 12.01.2026, and provided no explanation for his prolonged absence or failure to recall the NBW. The court rejected his bail plea, finding the prosecution's objections—citing six pending NDPS cases and absconding risk—were meaningful and credible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Madurai District and Sessions Court dismissed M. Ramraj's bail petition in an NDPS Act case (Crl.M.P. No. 1175/2026). The court found that Ramraj was absent from four consecutive court hearings (21.08.2023, 13.09.2023, 01.11.2023, 06.12.2023), leading to issuance of a non-bailable warrant (NBW) executed on 12.01.2026, and provided no explanation for his prolonged absence or failure to recall the NBW. The court rejected his bail plea, finding the prosecution's objections—citing six pending NDPS cases and absconding risk—were meaningful and credible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts