Alex vs Inspector of Police Thirumangalam Taluk Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — 1003/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010015802026

e-Filing Number

28-02-2026

Filing Number

1230/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

1003/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

40

Police Station

Thirumangalam Taluk P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Alex

    Adv. REVATHI

  2. 2.Vijaymanickam

    Adv. REVATHI

  3. 3.Mukesh

    Adv. REVATHI

  4. 4.Rajithaganthi

    Adv. REVATHI

  5. 5.Manimaran

    Adv. REVATHI

  6. 6.Balakrishnan

    Adv. REVATHI

  7. 7.Ponnusamy

    Adv. REVATHI

  8. 8.Oorakalan

    Adv. REVATHI

  9. 9.Vignesh

    Adv. REVATHI

  10. 10.Munisankar

    Adv. REVATHI

  11. 11.Sasi

    Adv. REVATHI

  12. 12.Ambspandi

    Adv. REVATHI

  13. 13.Chellam alias Selvam

    Adv. REVATHI

  14. 14.Jeyakumar

    Adv. REVATHI

  15. 15.Selvakumar

    Adv. REVATHI

  16. 16.Thangaraj

    Adv. REVATHI

  17. 17.Balamurugan

    Adv. REVATHI

  18. 18.Sathish

    Adv. REVATHI

  19. 19.Mahendran

    Adv. REVATHI

  20. 20.Sakthivel

    Adv. REVATHI

  21. 21.Manikandan

    Adv. REVATHI

  22. 22.Selvam

    Adv. REVATHI

  23. 23.Manikandan

    Adv. REVATHI

  24. 24.Ramesh

    Adv. REVATHI

  25. 25.Ramesh

    Adv. REVATHI

  26. 26.Pukazhenthi

    Adv. REVATHI

  27. 27.Lakshmanan

    Adv. REVATHI

  28. 28.Alagar

    Adv. REVATHI

  29. 29.Sundharam

    Adv. REVATHI

  30. 30.Muthuraj

    Adv. REVATHI

  31. 31.Selvamkumar

    Adv. REVATHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police Thirumangalam Taluk Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai, granted anticipatory bail to two advocates (petitioners in Crl.M.P.No.935/2026) involved in a temple violence case, finding them unlikely to abscond given their professional status and no prior criminal records. However, the court rejected anticipatory bail for 30 other accused (petitioners in Crl.M.P.No.1003/2026), citing the serious nature of offences, ongoing communal tension, and need for custodial interrogation—the case involved a violent conflict over temple religious activities where accused allegedly assaulted complainants with weapons and damaged property worth ₹20,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1003/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai, granted anticipatory bail to two advocates (petitioners in Crl.M.P.No.935/2026) involved in a temple violence case, finding them unlikely to abscond given their professional status and no prior criminal records. However, the court rejected anticipatory bail for 30 other accused (petitioners in Crl.M.P.No.1003/2026), citing the serious nature of offences, ongoing communal tension, and need for custodial interrogation—the case involved a violent conflict over temple religious activities where accused allegedly assaulted complainants with weapons and damaged property worth ₹20,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case