South Gate P.s. vs Divya Selvaraj Advocate - NISHANTH PERIYAARASU B C — 977/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 10th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMD010015702026
Filing Number
1224/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
977/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
26
Police Station
South Gate Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
South Gate P.s.
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
Divya Selvaraj Advocate - NISHANTH PERIYAARASU B C
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 07-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 04-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed the bail petition of Divya Selvaraj (accused A3) under Section 483 BNSS in a cheating case involving Rs.25 lakhs allegedly collected for gold business investment. Although the petitioner claimed she was uninvolved in the transactions, the court found that Rs.23 lakhs were credited to and withdrawn from her bank account, establishing her connection to the alleged crime. The court refused bail citing early-stage investigation, large amounts involved, pending similar cases, and unrecovered cheated amounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed the bail petition of Divya Selvaraj (accused A3) under Section 483 BNSS in a cheating case involving Rs.25 lakhs allegedly collected for gold business investment. Although the petitioner claimed she was uninvolved in the transactions, the court found that Rs.23 lakhs were credited to and withdrawn from her bank account, establishing her connection to the alleged crime. The court refused bail citing early-stage investigation, large amounts involved, pending similar cases, and unrecovered cheated amounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts