South Gate P.s. vs Divya Selvaraj Advocate - NISHANTH PERIYAARASU B C — 977/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 10th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010015702026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1224/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

977/2026

Registration Date

03-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

FIR Details

FIR Number

26

Police Station

South Gate Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

South Gate P.s.

Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

Divya Selvaraj Advocate - NISHANTH PERIYAARASU B C

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Enquiry

07-03-2026

Enquiry

04-03-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed the bail petition of Divya Selvaraj (accused A3) under Section 483 BNSS in a cheating case involving Rs.25 lakhs allegedly collected for gold business investment. Although the petitioner claimed she was uninvolved in the transactions, the court found that Rs.23 lakhs were credited to and withdrawn from her bank account, establishing her connection to the alleged crime. The court refused bail citing early-stage investigation, large amounts involved, pending similar cases, and unrecovered cheated amounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed the bail petition of Divya Selvaraj (accused A3) under Section 483 BNSS in a cheating case involving Rs.25 lakhs allegedly collected for gold business investment. Although the petitioner claimed she was uninvolved in the transactions, the court found that Rs.23 lakhs were credited to and withdrawn from her bank account, establishing her connection to the alleged crime. The court refused bail citing early-stage investigation, large amounts involved, pending similar cases, and unrecovered cheated amounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Madurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case