South Gate P.s. vs Divya Selvaraj Advocate - NISHANTH PERIYAARASU B C — 977/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 10th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMD010015702026
Filing Number
1224/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
977/2026
Registration Date
03-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
26
Police Station
South Gate Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.South Gate P.s.
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Divya Selvaraj Advocate - NISHANTH PERIYAARASU B C
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed the bail petition of Divya Selvaraj (accused A3) under Section 483 BNSS in a cheating case involving Rs.25 lakhs allegedly collected for gold business investment. Although the petitioner claimed she was uninvolved in the transactions, the court found that Rs.23 lakhs were credited to and withdrawn from her bank account, establishing her connection to the alleged crime. The court refused bail citing early-stage investigation, large amounts involved, pending similar cases, and unrecovered cheated amounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 977/2026
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai dismissed the bail petition of Divya Selvaraj (accused A3) under Section 483 BNSS in a cheating case involving Rs.25 lakhs allegedly collected for gold business investment. Although the petitioner claimed she was uninvolved in the transactions, the court found that Rs.23 lakhs were credited to and withdrawn from her bank account, establishing her connection to the alleged crime. The court refused bail citing early-stage investigation, large amounts involved, pending similar cases, and unrecovered cheated amounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts