Aandavar vs Usilatti Town Ps. Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — 978/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010015572026

e-Filing Number

27-02-2026

Filing Number

1214/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

978/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Partially Allowed

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

69

Police Station

Usilampatti Town Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Aandavar

    Adv. S. Sasikumar

  2. 2.Vijayandavar

    Adv. S. Sasikumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Usilatti Town Ps (Police Station). Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge rejected anticipatory bail for the first petitioner (Aandavar) due to his involvement in 10 previous criminal cases (2015-2024) and serious allegations of assaulting the complainant with an iron rod, but granted anticipatory bail to the second petitioner (Vijayandavar) with conditions including Rs.10,000 bond, daily police reporting for 15 days, and cooperation with investigation, as no serious charges were leveled against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 978/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge rejected anticipatory bail for the first petitioner (Aandavar) due to his involvement in 10 previous criminal cases (2015-2024) and serious allegations of assaulting the complainant with an iron rod, but granted anticipatory bail to the second petitioner (Vijayandavar) with conditions including Rs.10,000 bond, daily police reporting for 15 days, and cooperation with investigation, as no serious charges were leveled against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case