The Inspector of Police, Ayikudi P.S vs Jeyamani alias Jeyam — 1029/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 348. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 27th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMD010015232026
Filing Number
1191/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
1029/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Madurai
Judge
7-Spl. Judge for Communal Clash Cases
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
52
Police Station
Ayakkudi P.S.
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Inspector of Police, Ayikudi P.S
Adv. SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
Jeyamani alias Jeyam
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Spl. Judge for Communal Clash Cases
Disposed
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-04-2026 | Appearance |
| 06-04-2026 | Appearance |
| 16-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 13-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 1029/2026 The Madurai District and Sessions Court allowed the prosecution's petition to recall witness PW5 in an NDPS drug case against accused Jeyamani. Though PW5 had already testified regarding the raid and seizure of contraband, the recovered drugs and samples collected at the crime scene had not been formally marked as evidence. The court found that marking the contraband was necessary for proper prosecution and just adjudication, and that allowing the recall would cause no prejudice to the accused while aiding the court's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1029/2026 The Madurai District and Sessions Court allowed the prosecution's petition to recall witness PW5 in an NDPS drug case against accused Jeyamani. Though PW5 had already testified regarding the raid and seizure of contraband, the recovered drugs and samples collected at the crime scene had not been formally marked as evidence. The court found that marking the contraband was necessary for proper prosecution and just adjudication, and that allowing the recall would cause no prejudice to the accused while aiding the court's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts