The Inspector of Police, Ayikudi P.S vs Jeyamani alias Jeyam — 1029/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 348. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 27th April 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD010015232026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1191/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

1029/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Madurai

Judge

7-Spl. Judge for Communal Clash Cases

Decision Date

27th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

52

Police Station

Ayakkudi P.S.

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 348

Petitioner(s)

The Inspector of Police, Ayikudi P.S

Adv. SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

Jeyamani alias Jeyam

Hearing History

Judge: 7-Spl. Judge for Communal Clash Cases

27-04-2026

Disposed

20-04-2026

Appearance

06-04-2026

Appearance

16-03-2026

Appearance

13-03-2026

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

27-04-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Case Summary: 1029/2026 The Madurai District and Sessions Court allowed the prosecution's petition to recall witness PW5 in an NDPS drug case against accused Jeyamani. Though PW5 had already testified regarding the raid and seizure of contraband, the recovered drugs and samples collected at the crime scene had not been formally marked as evidence. The court found that marking the contraband was necessary for proper prosecution and just adjudication, and that allowing the recall would cause no prejudice to the accused while aiding the court's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1029/2026 The Madurai District and Sessions Court allowed the prosecution's petition to recall witness PW5 in an NDPS drug case against accused Jeyamani. Though PW5 had already testified regarding the raid and seizure of contraband, the recovered drugs and samples collected at the crime scene had not been formally marked as evidence. The court found that marking the contraband was necessary for proper prosecution and just adjudication, and that allowing the recall would cause no prejudice to the accused while aiding the court's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Madurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case